Why ‘racial discrimination’ is more accurate than ‘food desert’

I He wasn’t living in the best neighborhood growing up as a black youth. Decades have passed, but I still remember the days of emptying my little piggy bank and taking a 15-minute walk to McDonald’s for a regular $1 McChicken lunch. When food was scarce in the house and my only mother worked the weekend shift, this was my usual practice. The second closest place to get any kind of food or snack was the corner liquor store, but the entry of a 13 year old was disappointing.

Getting to the grocery stores to get what my family calls “good food” wasn’t out of the question, but given the distance, these trips were choppy. So, what groceries are we she did It was meant to last as long as possible, which meant plenty of packaged, shelf-stable foods. On the days when the show was running low, well, the McChickens abounded.

I didn’t really know this situation was abnormal, and certainly didn’t know there was a name for it, until I started my undergraduate degree in Nutrition and Dietetics. At the time, I learned that I had spent my childhood living in what is commonly referred to as the “food desert”. As I learned more about the racial and social climate of the United States (particularly in recent years), I came to believe that a name change was sorely needed. These aren’t food deserts – they’re American apartheid.

What is desert food?

Before we set out on the playing field in order to change how these areas are categorized, let’s briefly cover what the food desert currently means. “As a dietitian, I’ve learned to define a ‘food desert’ as any area that lacks easy access to a grocery store, usually within a specified range such as ‘within two miles’ or ‘along a public transit route,'” Kara Harbstreet, MS, RD, LD, from Street Smart Nutrition. Basically, for people who live in these areas without access to transportation, getting fresh food or viable groceries is a challenge – almost deserted.

You may also have heard the term “food swamp”. Its meaning is similar in that there is access to some Food, but may be Much lower nutritional quality compared to what you find in the supermarket. “Food swamps speak to neighborhoods with more stores or bodegas than full-service grocery stores,” says Harbstreet.

Harbstreet Point brings me to the demographic factor: areas known as food deserts and food swamps It is largely occupied by minority groups, especially African Americans, of low socioeconomic status. In homes with little money and easy access to food that is usually fast food or any energy-dense snack that can be found at the nearest gas station, it is not surprising that The nutritional status of this population is poor.

we hope that also Unsurprisingly, telling these individuals to “try hard” or to “prioritize their health” does little to address the problem. “If someone works two or more jobs, we can’t just ask them to travel to get food,” he says. Shanna Mini Spence, MS, RDN, CDN, is a comprehensive anti-diet and weight loss dietitian working in the field of public health. “If someone is really struggling to put food on the table, the fact that travel costs money will be at the top of their concern.”

Why is the term “racial discrimination” more accurate

Such unrealistic suggestions along the lines of these “work harder” will likely sound familiar to many minority communities, who have been repeatedly asked to put up their shoes if they want equality – not just in fresh food and access to water, but also in housing, social image and income. This is another form of oppression towards these marginalized groups, and for this reason “Food apartheid,” not “food deserts,” is a phrase that has more than one episode of justice.

Unlike actual Nevada deserts or Florida swamps, the phenomena we call “food deserts” and “food swamps” do not occur naturally.

In the wake of the Great Depression, it was The New Deal was enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt “To restore prosperity to Americans.” Well, these Americans don’t seem to include black Americans. That’s because the New Deal has made housing more affordable than ever, but almost all homes are built only in the white suburbs. in addition to, Home loans were significantly more difficult to obtain for black Americans than for white Americans. Thus, the practice of redlining – the refusal of mortgage insurance in and around black neighborhoods – was in full force. Redlining is named because the actual red lines will be so Drawn on maps to mark African American neighborhoods as “hazardous”.

as a result of, Most minorities were exiled to unattractive parts of the city and into poor housingwhich made it unattractive for major supermarket chains to build their locations in these areas. The reason why slums are rich in liquor and corner stores is unclear, with Many activists believe they were planted there to deliberately poison certain ethnic groups with alcoholprocessed snacks and low-quality foods. However, discriminatory practices are likely to blame for how neighborhoods are historically structured. In fact, the prevalence of liquor stores in low-income and minority neighborhoods cannot be explained by supply and demand, as African Americans and Latino communities reported drinking lower rates than whites. Studies have found that These stores tend to be located in areas with lower retail rents which also happen to be areas inhabited by poorer minority populations. These different land values ​​can be easily explained by the above red line practices.

It’s crazy that this information has not been so widely taught or known, and this lack of awareness fuels the deeply held beliefs of some white Americans that minorities with bad homes and even more dismal meals are that way due to a lack of consistency. “It is implied that the responsibility lies with society rather than established systems. People completely wrongly assume that people in lower income areas – which are mostly communities of color – want more saturation of fast food restaurants and want more convenience stores. This is simply not true. Spence says.

Institutional racism that gave birth to food apartheid It produced a health crisis among these communities. as such Jesse Lunsford, RDN, Ph.D.“Our diet is directly linked to profits, which necessarily requires companies to manage costs while raising prices. Nowhere in this equation is a consideration of fitness for human health,” says assistant professor in the department of nutrition at Metropolitan State University of Denver. Healthy foods — such as fresh produce, dairy products, lean meats, and whole grains — are often too expensive for people on low incomes. Even if they could travel far from their apartheid system for groceries, The tube dream of a ‘healthy diet’ remains elusive. The dominant high-class way of eating for health is promoted as rich in foods such as seafood, quinoa, exclusively organic produce, naturally sweetened beverages, and grass-fed meats.

For minority residents who can’t eat this way every day (and who Cultural foods are not included in Western conversations about “healthy eating”), it breeds desperation in order to achieve a healthy diet. Thus, the easiest option is to eat everything that is closer and cheaper. “There is nothing about being black that makes someone more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than a white person, and yet the rates are higher in black Americans than in white Americans,” Dr. Lunsford says. Correlation with methodological findings.” Black communities have A disproportionately higher chance of developing nutritionally-related chronic diseasesGiven the state of food imposed by the government, it is not hard to see why.

All of this brings us back to why “food apartheid” is a more accurate description of these societies than “food desert”. by dictionary definitionApartheid is “the past policy of political, social and economic segregation and discrimination against the non-white majority in the Republic of South Africa.” But apartheid is not just the politics associated with South Africa. The word “apartheid” is more correct because it includes All Among the factors that produced the so-called food deserts: segregation, red squatting, real estate discrimination, and the economic consumption of black neighborhood land value. And did any of the above happen naturally, as happens in the desert? of course not.

Take steps towards a fairer future

So, what can we do to advance toward universal food sovereignty? Well, the aforementioned change of language about “food deserts” is an easy first step. “I think words are important in public health,” Dr. Lunsford says, “and it is probably harder to ignore the word ‘apartheid’ than the word ‘desert’ or ‘swamp.’ That’s exactly the point: to make this issue something you can’t ignore.”

Just as food deserts didn’t just emerge as a natural phenomenon, the marginalized communities that lived in them didn’t put themselves out there – so did institutional racism. Therefore, it is the responsibility of these institutions, and not the groups oppressed by them, to improve the situation. “I can’t stress enough that people need to pay attention to what’s going on in their communities with local officials and projects,” Spence says. “We pay attention to the greater part of our federal elections, but it is the local officials who have a say over the regions and change can really be made.”

All Americans need to raise our awareness of this food segregation very much They exist, and they are found here in our communities. However, if you are isolated from the effects of apartheid, it is easy to go unnoticed and, therefore, unchanged.

The effect of poverty and race on health is why I became a dietitian. I have watched many members of my African American family deteriorate from type 2 diabetes and heart disease due to a lack of nutritional education and other resources to support a healthy lifestyle. It is infuriating to know that these hardships have often been a residual result of the policies put in place by the same bodies that are supposed to protect our liberties and our lives.

The apartheid’s summoning of food forward might turn some eyes and make others feel rough at first. It’s certainly uncomfortable, but we haven’t made a complacent change in this country. Although discomfort is an inevitable source of social discourse for any kind of human rights shift, it is vital for the affected population. So, let’s start with the comfort of the term “food apartheid,” so we can realize the hopes of eliminating it.

Leave a Comment